save_page_builder_payload
Save the BeBuilder payload to persist page content and layout on a BeTheme WordPress site.
Instructions
Persist a BeBuilder payload for a page.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| builder_payload | Yes |
Save the BeBuilder payload to persist page content and layout on a BeTheme WordPress site.
Persist a BeBuilder payload for a page.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| builder_payload | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description only says 'persist', which implies creation or mutation. With no annotations and no further details, it lacks transparency about idempotency, side effects, required permissions, or error behavior. For a write operation, more disclosure is needed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise (single sentence) but lacks structure. It could benefit from brief parameter explanation or usage context while remaining succinct. As it stands, it is not overly verbose but leaves out important information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given there are two required parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not cover return values, error handling, or behavior when the id does not exist. The tool's context is simple, but the description should still provide essential operational details.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, so the description should explain the parameters. However, it only mentions 'BeBuilder payload for a page' without detailing the 'builder_payload' format or the role of 'id'. The description adds minimal semantic value beyond the bare schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (persist) and the resource (BeBuilder payload for a page). The name 'save_page_builder_payload' reinforces this. While it is clear, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'get_page_builder_payload', but the contrast is implied.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, typical scenarios, or exclusions. Given the sibling tools, explicit usage recommendations would help.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zacdreyer/wp-betheme-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server