bili-agent
Related Servers
Alternatives to bili-agent
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceThis server organizes Bilibili's extensive functionalities—including searching, video data retrieval, comments, and user information—into structured, actionable tools for agents. It enables read operations across various content types and provides secure, confirmable writing tools for interaction.42MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for interacting with Bilibili, enabling AI assistants to search videos, fetch comments and subtitles, publish content, and manage interactions. It also adds private message reading, stable TV login, and an automated comment workflow requiring human confirmation.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables standard MCP clients to search Bilibili videos, read subtitles and comments, extract video frames, manage favorites and follow relationships, access personalized feeds and history, and send or read private messages. It also supports QR login, configurable daily browsing reports, and profile, emoji, and dynamic operations.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables users to search Bilibili videos, access trending rankings, and retrieve detailed information about videos, content creators, and anime schedules. It allows AI applications to interact directly with Bilibili content via simple API interfaces.125 npm198MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceBilibili MCP server enabling video search, comment management, danmaku, user info, dynamics, live streaming analysis, and more via 31 tools.316,555 npm7MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides tools for parsing and retrieving Bilibili video information, including video details, download links, and collection listings.535 npm1-
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a distinct phase of the workflow: search returns candidates, get_video reads metadata and parts, read_video returns subtitles, sample_frames returns screenshots, and save_videos/get_save_receipt handle writes vs. verification. The descriptions explicitly delimit boundaries (e.g., search candidates are not auto-saved, preview=true only checks), so an agent can pick correctly.
All eight tools use a uniform bilibili_ prefix with snake_case verb_noun phrasing (list_favorite_folders, read_video, search, get_video, sample_frames, save_videos, get_save_receipt). The only deviation is auth_status, a noun-form status query, which is a widely accepted convention.
Eight tools cover a research-then-save pipeline cleanly, with no redundant or filler entries. Each tool maps to a necessary step (discovery, inspection, verification of write, auth prerequisite).
The lifecycle is well covered: auth check, folder listing for save targets, search, metadata, subtitles, frame sampling, save with dedupe/preview, and receipt readback. Minor gaps remain — no way to list existing watch-later or favorite contents, no comment/metadata enrichment, and function removal is intentionally absent.