A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceExposes OpenAI's gpt-image-2 (image generation and editing) as an MCP server for tools like generate_image, edit_image, and iterative edit sessions.
6
39 npm
12
MIT
gpt-image-mcp
by zK0G0w
Related Servers
Alternatives to gpt-image-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to generate images and iteratively edit them using OpenAI's gpt-image-2 models, with session management, background job polling, and local file saving.8556 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Google Gemini media generation, exposing tools for generating and editing images, video, music, and async operations via stdio.131,015 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceWraps the Micu image API as an MCP server for generating, editing, batch processing, and multi-reference image fusion, supporting GPT-image-2 and Grok models.599-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables generating, editing, and multi-turn editing of images using OpenAI's gpt-image models directly from Claude or any MCP client.41MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA standalone MCP server that exposes YYLX gpt-image-2 image generation as a generate_image tool, returning inline images directly in the conversation via stdio.MIT
TDQS
A4.4/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: check_endpoint validates API connectivity, generate_image creates new images, and edit_image modifies existing images. There is no meaningful overlap between these operations, so an agent can confidently select the right tool.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow the same verb_noun snake_case pattern: check_endpoint, generate_image, edit_image. This makes the tool set highly predictable and easy to reason about.
Tool Count5/5
Three tools is well-scoped for a focused GPT Image MCP server: endpoint validation, generation, and editing cover the core functionality without unnecessary bloat. Each tool earns its place.
Completeness4/5
The set covers the primary image lifecycle: checking endpoint availability, generating images, and editing existing images. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit model listing or image variation/upscale capabilities, but the core workflows are complete enough for most use cases.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues