@avclabs.ai/enhance-mcpofficial
A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceEnables video enhancement through MCP tools for creating tasks, querying status, and synchronous enhancement, supporting URL or local file inputs.
3
42 npm
Apache 2.0
Video Enhancement MCP Server
by z416479660
Related Servers
Alternatives to Video Enhancement MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA video enhancement MCP server that supports creating tasks, querying status, and synchronously enhancing videos with URL or local file input.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables image and video generation and editing through MCP tools, including image editing, upscaling, background removal, video generation, image-to-video, and video extension. Video generation runs asynchronously with job status and result retrieval.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes video generation and editing tools to MCP-capable clients, enabling text-to-video, image-to-video, video editing, reusable voice and character profiles, and task status queries through natural language.3MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to manage video composition projects, run linting, render videos, capture snapshots, and monitor/cancel long-running jobs via MCP.11-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-capable clients to generate higher-fidelity videos via Wan 3.0 Prime, supporting text-to-video, image-to-video, multimodal reference-to-video, and async task status polling.2MIT
TDQS
C2.7/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation1/5
The tool descriptions are extremely confusing and overlapping. The 'create_task' tool appears to be described twice with different parameter sets (first mentioning 'enhance_video_sync', then mentioning 'poll_interval', 'timeout', and 'get_task_status'), making it unclear if these are separate tools or one poorly described tool. There's no clear distinction between what each tool does, and the descriptions suggest they might all be part of the same functionality.
Naming Consistency1/5
Only one tool name 'create_task' is provided, but the description suggests multiple tools or functionalities. The naming is chaotic with no discernible pattern, and the description mixes parameter names with what appear to be additional tool names ('get_task_status'), creating complete inconsistency.
Tool Count2/5
The server claims 3 tools but only lists one tool name ('create_task'). The description is so poorly structured that it's impossible to determine what the actual tools are. For a video enhancement server, 3 tools could be appropriate, but the actual implementation appears to be a single tool with confusing documentation.
Completeness2/5
For a video enhancement server, we would expect tools for creating tasks, checking status, and retrieving results. The description suggests some of these functionalities exist but they're all muddled together in one tool description. There's no clear separation of operations, making the surface appear severely incomplete despite potentially having the necessary functionality buried in the confusing documentation.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues