Code Merge MCP
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_file_treeC | Retrieves the file tree structure of the project. |
| merge_contentC | Merges content from multiple files into a single output file. |
| analyze_codeC | Analyzes code files and provides statistics. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| code-merge | |
| code-review | |
| code-explain |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: analyze_code focuses on code statistics, get_file_tree on project structure, and merge_content on file merging. An agent can easily tell them apart without confusion.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (analyze_code, get_file_tree, merge_content), using snake_case throughout. The naming is predictable and readable across the set.
With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a code merge server, as it lacks operations like conflict resolution, version control integration, or undo capabilities. However, it covers basic analysis and merging functions reasonably.
The tools provide analysis, structure retrieval, and merging, but there are notable gaps for a code merge domain, such as handling merge conflicts, comparing files, or reverting changes. Agents might struggle with advanced merge scenarios.