Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ssh-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that converts SSH operations on training servers into AI-callable tools for GPU monitoring, job submission, file transfer, and more.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      SSH-based MCP server that enables remote execution of SSH commands, file transfers, and secure server management via the MCP protocol.
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables secure remote management of the platform through nine MCP tools over STDIO and HTTP, including terminal execution, service controls, and live status monitoring.
      261 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that enables running structured commands and fleet operations on SSH hosts, supporting secure file transfer, persistent sessions, and bastion-based discovery.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A lightweight, zero-agent SSH operations tool that enables remote command execution, file transfer, and audit logging. It integrates as an MCP server for AI-driven infrastructure management.
      5 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (execute, upload, service control, tunnel management), but ssh_check and ssh_system_status both report host health, and ssh_job_status versus ssh_job_list overlap in querying jobs. Descriptions help disambiguate, but the boundaries aren't perfectly sharp.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case with a consistent ssh_ prefix and mostly a verb-first pattern (list, execute, start, cancel). However, ssh_service_control and ssh_file_progress deviate from the verb-noun structure, creating minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    19 tools is on the higher end but justified by the broad scope covering execution, file transfer, job lifecycle, services, monitoring, and tunnels. The count feels slightly heavy but each tool serves a distinct area without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides strong lifecycle coverage for jobs, services, files, and tunnels, plus system and GPU monitoring. Minor gaps like remote directory listing or file deletion are absent but workaroundable, so core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues