Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Hands

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      macOS MCP server that enables AI agents to directly control the host OS, including mouse, keyboard, windows, files, and accessibility automation for computer-use workflows.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enterprise-grade macOS MCP server that gives AI agents eyes, hands, and a terminal, enabling screen capture, mouse/keyboard control, shell commands, and file operations.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI to fully control macOS — mouse, keyboard, terminal, screenshots, window management, UI element detection, and provides AI-optimized information reporting.
      36
      26 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents real OS-level control of macOS, enabling them to click real buttons, type real keys, and observe rendered screens just like a human would.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for macOS that enables AI agents to control the desktop GUI through keyboard input, mouse actions, and screen captures. It provides stable low-level primitives for UI automation and agent-driven desktop workflows.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A macOS MCP server that enables safe computer use by redacting password fields from screenshots, requiring explicit consent before clicks or typing, and logging all actions to an append-only audit file; it provides 12 tools for screen capture, UI inspection, and input control.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resource-action pairs (mouse, keyboard, window, app, clipboard). The observation/verification trio (find_text, wait, verify) has overlapping text-matching concepts, but descriptions clearly delineate fuzzy search vs exact wait vs assertion, so agents can select correctly.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set uses a consistent underscore style but mixes noun-verb (window_list, mouse_move) with verb-noun (get_state, find_text) and bare verbs/nouns (wait, screenshot). Within each domain (mouse, clipboard, window, app) the pattern is consistent, so it's predictable overall.

    Tool Count4/5

    22 tools is on the high end, but the server's scope is broad GUI automation (input, observation, window management, clipboard, verification), so each tool covers a distinct capability and the count is justifiable.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full interactive loop: observe (screenshot, get_ui_tree, find_text), act (mouse, keyboard, clipboard), manage windows/apps, and verify outcomes (wait, verify). No obvious dead ends; sequences allow batching.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues