Skip to main content
Glama
yusuferenkt

MCP JSON Database Server

by yusuferenkt

update_call_transcript

Updates existing call transcripts by modifying resolution status, follow-up requirements, and assigned personnel in the JSON Database Server.

Instructions

Mevcut transkripti günceller

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tokenYesJWT token
idYesTranskript ID'si
resolutionNoÇözüm durumu
followUpRequiredNoTakip gerekli mi?
assignedToNoAtanan kullanıcı ID'si

Implementation Reference

  • src/index.js:191-205 (registration)
    Registration of the 'update_call_transcript' tool in the ListToolsRequestSchema handler, including its input schema definition. Note: No corresponding handler implementation (case statement) found in the CallToolRequestSchema switch.
    {
      name: 'update_call_transcript',
      description: 'Mevcut transkripti günceller',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          token: { type: 'string', description: 'JWT token' },
          id: { type: 'number', description: 'Transkript ID\'si' },
          resolution: { type: 'string', description: 'Çözüm durumu' },
          followUpRequired: { type: 'boolean', description: 'Takip gerekli mi?' },
          assignedTo: { type: 'number', description: 'Atanan kullanıcı ID\'si' }
        },
        required: ['token', 'id']
      }
    },
  • Input schema defining the parameters for the update_call_transcript tool: token (required), id (required), resolution, followUpRequired, assignedTo.
    inputSchema: {
      type: 'object',
      properties: {
        token: { type: 'string', description: 'JWT token' },
        id: { type: 'number', description: 'Transkript ID\'si' },
        resolution: { type: 'string', description: 'Çözüm durumu' },
        followUpRequired: { type: 'boolean', description: 'Takip gerekli mi?' },
        assignedTo: { type: 'number', description: 'Atanan kullanıcı ID\'si' }
      },
      required: ['token', 'id']
    }
  • Permission constant TRANSCRIPT_UPDATE likely intended for use in the update_call_transcript handler for authorization checks.
    TRANSCRIPT_UPDATE: 'transcript:update',
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. 'Günceller' (updates) implies a mutation operation, but the description doesn't disclose important behavioral traits: what permissions are required, whether the operation is idempotent, what happens to unspecified fields, error conditions, or response format. For a mutation tool with zero annotation coverage, this leaves significant gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that gets straight to the point with zero wasted words. It's appropriately sized for a tool with good schema documentation and follows the principle of front-loading the core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with 5 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't address critical context: what fields can be updated, what the response contains, error handling, or authentication requirements. The agent must rely heavily on the parameter schema and trial-and-error to understand this tool's behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all parameters are documented in the schema. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond the generic 'updates existing transcript' statement. It doesn't explain relationships between parameters, provide examples, or clarify edge cases. The baseline score of 3 reflects adequate but minimal value added beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Mevcut transkripti günceller' (Updates existing transcript) clearly states the action (günceller/update) and resource (transkript/transcript). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'add_call_transcript' by specifying it updates existing records rather than creating new ones. However, it doesn't specify what aspects of the transcript are updated beyond the general concept.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There's no mention of prerequisites (like needing an existing transcript ID), when not to use it, or how it differs from similar operations. The agent must infer usage from the tool name and parameter schema alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yusuferenkt/mcp-database'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server