A
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceEnables Codex to delegate coding tasks to an OpenCode CLI locally, returning structured results such as exit codes, session summaries, tool calls, and git diffs.
2
MIT
opencode-v2-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to opencode-v2-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables ISLI agents and MCP clients to dispatch natural-language coding and terminal tasks to a locally-installed Claude Code CLI, supporting both one-shot execution and persistent sessions with workspace and security controls.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI chat clients to delegate self-contained coding tasks to opencode's free-tier models as a one-shot subagent through a native MCP tool, without requiring shell commands or API keys.MIT
- FlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude Desktop to act as a planning agent while delegating coding tasks to OpenCode CLI, returning execution status, file diffs, and output, with support for continuing sessions and opening workspaces in IDEs.151-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceExposes opencode's coding agent and shell as MCP tools, enabling MCP-only AI clients to execute shell commands, manage files, and run agent sessions with async job handling.14 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables ChatGPT to drive a local OpenCode session over a secure MCP connection for reading, editing, and reporting inside authorized repositories, while destructive actions require explicit human approval and checkpoints.1MIT
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 1 tool
Disambiguation5/5
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool's purpose is singular and clearly defined.
Naming Consistency3/5
The single tool name 'opencode_execute' is clear and follows a verb_noun pattern, but with only one tool, there is no pattern to evaluate. It is consistent within itself, though limited.
Tool Count1/5
With only a single tool, the server's surface is extremely thin. For a coding task execution server, one might expect at least a few operations (e.g., list tasks, cancel, etc.). This seems minimal and likely insufficient for robust use.
Completeness1/5
The single tool appears to cover only one narrow action (execute a coding task). There are no supporting tools for querying status, listing tasks, or managing results, leading to significant gaps in typical workflow coverage.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues