Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to korean-law-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides 17 tools for accessing Korean statutes, precedents, and administrative rules via the National Law Information Center API, with LLM hallucination prevention, citation verification, impact graphs, and time-travel diff.
      4,664 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search, retrieve, and analyze South Korean legal documents including statutes, precedents, constitutional decisions, and administrative rulings via the Ministry of Government Legislation Open API. Provides 89 specialized tools with features like legal abbreviation auto-recognition, annex extraction, and complex research chain workflows.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates 132 tools from the Korean Ministry of Legislation OPEN API to provide comprehensive access to Korean legal documents, including statutes, precedents, treaties, administrative rules, and local ordinances.
      9
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables real-time search and analysis of Korean laws, legal precedents, and administrative rules through the National Law Information Center Open API, allowing AI agents to access official legal information for contract review, compliance, and legal research.
      73
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and retrieve Korean laws, regulations, administrative rules, legal interpretations, and precedents via official APIs for legal review workflows.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and analyze Korean law, including statutes, precedents, and ordinances, with citation verification and impact analysis.
      10
      4,664 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct purpose: search_law finds identifiers, get_law_text retrieves text, ordinance_radar checks ordinance alignment, get_annexes extracts annexes, legal_research handles complex multi-step queries, legal_analysis does verification, discover_tools/execute_tool are meta, search_decisions searches decisions, get_decision_text retrieves decision text. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern in snake_case (search_law, get_law_text, get_annexes, search_decisions, get_decision_text, discover_tools, execute_tool). A few (legal_research, legal_analysis, ordinance_radar) are noun-based rather than verb-based, creating a slight stylistic inconsistency but still readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools is well-suited for a legal research server. It covers core search/retrieval, specialized analysis, meta tools for extending capabilities, and a unified decision search—all essential without being excessive. Each tool adds distinct functionality.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for legal research: law search/text/annexes, ordinance compliance, multi-domain decision search/retrieval, citation verification, and meta tools to access 80+ specialized tools. Missing operations are covered via legal_research scenarios and discover_tools, leaving no obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues