make_get_scenario

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must stand alone. It states 'Get full details... (status, scheduling, team, description, etc.)' but does not disclose potential errors, rate limits, or whether the operation is read-only (implied but not explicit). Adequate for a simple retrieval.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with purpose and scope. No unnecessary words. Appropriate length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Simple retrieval tool with one parameter, no output schema, no nested objects. Description covers the basic purpose and parameter, but could benefit from mentioning the output structure or example. Adequate but minimal.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter 'scenario_id' described as 'The scenario ID'. Description adds 'by its ID' but no additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Get full details of a single Make.com scenario by its ID', specifying the action (get), resource (scenario), and scope (single, full details, by ID). Distinguishes from sibling tools like 'make_list_scenarios' which lists multiple scenarios.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage: when you need full details of a single scenario by ID. No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use compared to siblings like 'make_list_scenarios' or 'make_get_execution'. Minimal guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.