make_run_scenario

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses wait behavior, timeout (~40s), fire-and-forget mode, and error condition. No annotations provided, so description covers key behaviors well, though lacks details like rate limits or idempotency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is about 5 sentences, front-loaded with main action. Each sentence adds value, though could be slightly more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers essential usage and return behavior, but lacks description of output format (no output schema) and what happens with invalid scenario_id. Adequate for a moderate complexity tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description adds meaning beyond schema by explaining the wait parameter's effect on return value and the data parameter's conditional relevance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool runs a Make.com scenario on demand. It distinguishes from siblings like make_start_scenario by noting the scenario must be active, implying this tool is for execution not activation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use (on demand) and when not (scenario must be active), with direct reference to make_start_scenario for activation. Also explains wait parameter options and data parameter relevance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.