Skip to main content
Glama
yukinuma-cpu

agent-bridge-mcp

by yukinuma-cpu

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-bridge-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets ChatGPT or any MCP client securely delegate coding tasks to a local Claude Code instance, with git checkpointing, approval gates, and structured results. Supports code review, test running, and rollback via simple tool calls.
      13 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that bridges CLI coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, opencode, and Antigravity into any MCP client, enabling synchronous and asynchronous task execution, follow-up input, and a structured code review tool.
      223 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that bridges Claude Code with Antigravity CLI using a Swarm Agent architecture to optimize local development workflows and minimize LLM token costs. Includes a web UI for monitoring agent workflows.
      29
      718 PyPI
      25
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that spawns autonomous Claude Code agents in GitHub repos, enabling task delegation with persistent state, multi-step workflows, and job monitoring.
      47
      144 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP orchestration server that uses Codex as lead planner and Antigravity as host to delegate and review bounded tasks with Git integration and persistent SQLite state.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: send, cancel, check evidence, check status, list sessions, and run a full review loop. The only minor overlap is between agent_send and agent_review_loop, as both can dispatch work, but the latter is a higher-level workflow clearly distinguished by name and description.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names consistently follow the agent_verb or agent_verb_noun pattern (e.g., agent_send, agent_evidence_check, agent_review_loop). The naming is predictable and readable across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the surface is appropriately scoped for an agent orchestration and review bridge. Each tool provides a distinct function without overwhelming users or leaving the set feeling thin.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core workflow: dispatch, status, cancel, and an integrated review loop. Evidence check and session listing add useful supporting operations. A minor gap is the lack of an explicit tool to modify or configure review loop parameters, but the overall surface is solid.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues