Skip to main content
Glama
yuemingruoan

DeepSearch MCP

by yuemingruoan
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to DeepSearch MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • multi-api-web-search

      Peteroooooooo
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to perform web searches through multiple AI models, with dual-mode routing for fast or cited results and consensus-based multi-engine querying to cross-verify information.
      2
      -

    • qsearch

      theYahia
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform web searches with full content retrieval and multi-engine provenance, including trust scoring and local corpus persistence, via MCP integration.
      5 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • web-search-mcp

      hbhszy
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables real-time web search via DeepSeek's search-enhanced dialogue, providing search results as answers through MCP tools.
      1
      MIT

    • CrawlEyes

      waiky-github
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform web searches and extract full-text content from web pages via standard MCP tools, with fallback search and semantic reranking.
      2
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools are mostly distinct (one for broad search, one for site/time-targeted search), but both share the 'deepsearch' prefix and perform search operations, which could cause some confusion for an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent 'deepsearch' prefix pattern, with the second adding a '-web' suffix to indicate specialization. Naming is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools for a search-focused server, the surface is extremely thin. A typical search server would require more tools for different query types, result handling, or configuration.

    Completeness2/5

    The server only offers two search variants, lacking obvious features like result retrieval, pagination, search history, or advanced filters. This is severely incomplete for a search domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources