A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceProvides 30+ FFmpeg video and audio editing tools via MCP, enabling AI assistants to perform operations like trimming, transcoding, overlays, and composition directly.
27
4
MIT
ffmpeg-mcp
by yubraaj11
Related Servers
Alternatives to ffmpeg-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables any MCP host to probe, transcode, remux, extract, convert, thumbnail, and burn subtitles for video, audio, and images using local FFmpeg with safe typed tools and quality-first CRF/VBR defaults.10MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables comprehensive video/audio processing, analysis, and streaming via natural language by exposing 40+ FFmpeg tools as MCP tools.21-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceGives coding agents a local FFmpeg video-editing engine exposed over MCP, enabling them to probe, cut, join, reframe, caption, normalize audio, and verify the resulting media without cloud services or API keys. Every operation returns structured JSON and self-checks its own output against delivery specs.1,835 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLMs to perform FFmpeg operations like clipping, merging, extracting audio, adding subtitles, and transcoding videos via a set of tools exposed as an MCP server.58MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server exposing headless ffmpeg operations for video, audio, and image processing via auto-generated typed tools, enabling agentic media file manipulation.GPL 3.0
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 12 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have distinct purposes like clipping, cropping, extracting, and overlaying, but some overlap exists: 'clip_video' and 'trim_and_concat_operation' both involve trimming video segments, which could cause confusion. However, their descriptions clarify that 'clip_video' is for single clips while 'trim_and_concat_operation' handles multiple videos with concatenation, mitigating ambiguity.
Naming Consistency3/5
The naming is mixed with no clear pattern: some tools use verb_noun (e.g., 'clip_video', 'crop_video'), others use noun_verb (e.g., 'get_video_metadata'), and there are inconsistencies like 'overlay_image' vs. 'overlays_video'. While readable, the lack of a consistent convention across all tools reduces predictability.
Tool Count5/5
With 12 tools, the count is well-scoped for a video processing server, covering essential operations like editing, conversion, and metadata extraction. Each tool serves a specific function without redundancy, making the set comprehensive yet manageable for typical video manipulation tasks.
Completeness4/5
The toolset covers core video processing needs including clipping, cropping, scaling, overlaying, and format conversion, with good lifecycle coverage. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct tool for adding subtitles or advanced audio editing beyond extraction, but agents can likely work around these with the provided tools.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues