session_list
List all active SSH sessions with host, user, and uptime to monitor remote connections.
Instructions
List all active SSH sessions with host, user, uptime.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all active SSH sessions with host, user, and uptime to monitor remote connections.
List all active SSH sessions with host, user, uptime.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description fully carries the burden. It clearly states the operation is a read-only listing and specifies the returned fields, which is sufficient for a simple tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, front-loaded sentence with no unnecessary words, earning its place by conveying the tool's purpose concisely.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters, no output schema, and a simple listing function, the description is complete. It specifies what is listed and the output fields, leaving no gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so the baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter information, but none is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'List' and resource 'active SSH sessions' with explicit fields (host, user, uptime), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like session_connect or session_disconnect.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, though the purpose is straightforward. The description implies it is for viewing sessions, but lacks any exclusions or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yu-xiaohaozi/linux-remote-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server