geospatial-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to geospatial-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides 15 geospatial utility tools for AI agents, covering coordinate transformation, spatial data validation, elevation/terrain, viewshed analysis, and drone flight planning.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceGeospatial API tools for AI agents — geocoding, reverse geocoding, routing, isochrone, distance matrix, static maps, H3 hexagons, elevation, GPS map-matching, point-in-polygon, address normalisation, timezone lookup, and batch geocoding. Built on OpenStreetMap infrastructure. Cost-effective alternative to Google Maps API.1819 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides 14 comprehensive tools for geocoding, navigation, and visual mapping using Google Maps APIs. It also offers detailed environmental data including weather forecasts, air quality indices, and solar irradiance for location-based analysis and trip planning.1411MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides geographic coordinate geometry tools for computing midpoints, centroids, bounding boxes, and point-in-bbox tests, enabling spatial calculations via natural language queries.5 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides geolocation, routing, and navigation tools including geocoding, place search, distance matrix, and turn-by-turn directions via NextBillion.ai APIs.7 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides forward/reverse geocoding, bounding box extraction, nearby places discovery, batch geocoding, route waypoints, and administrative boundary lookup using OpenStreetMap data.10Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 22 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: coordinate validation/conversion/CRS transformation, geometry operations, place lookup, routing modes, terrain, weather, time, data conversion, and RF analysis are all separated. Descriptions explicitly cross-reference similar tools (e.g., coord_convert vs coord_transform_crs, geom_measure vs route_directions), so misselection is unlikely.
Tool names follow a predictable lower_snake_case prefix-based pattern (coord_, geom_, place_, route_, terrain_, rf_) and are readable. However, not all follow a single verb_noun grammar: some are noun_noun (route_directions, env_weather) or noun_prep_noun (time_at_location), making the convention consistent but not perfectly uniform.
At 22 tools, the count sits above the typical 3-15 range and feels slightly heavy, but the broad geospatial domain justifies the number. Each tool covers a distinct capability with no obvious redundancy, and the prefix grouping keeps the set navigable.
The tool surface covers core geospatial workflows well: coordinate/CRS handling, geometry analysis, geocoding/search, routing, terrain, weather, timezone, data conversion, and RF. Minor gaps such as batch geocoding, historical weather, or route optimization exist, but most are workarounds and tools compose cleanly (e.g., isochrones into geom_overlay/relate).