Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to geospatial-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides 15 geospatial utility tools for AI agents, covering coordinate transformation, spatial data validation, elevation/terrain, viewshed analysis, and drone flight planning.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Geospatial API tools for AI agents — geocoding, reverse geocoding, routing, isochrone, distance matrix, static maps, H3 hexagons, elevation, GPS map-matching, point-in-polygon, address normalisation, timezone lookup, and batch geocoding. Built on OpenStreetMap infrastructure. Cost-effective alternative to Google Maps API.
      18
      19 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides 14 comprehensive tools for geocoding, navigation, and visual mapping using Google Maps APIs. It also offers detailed environmental data including weather forecasts, air quality indices, and solar irradiance for location-based analysis and trip planning.
      14
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides geographic coordinate geometry tools for computing midpoints, centroids, bounding boxes, and point-in-bbox tests, enabling spatial calculations via natural language queries.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides forward/reverse geocoding, bounding box extraction, nearby places discovery, batch geocoding, route waypoints, and administrative boundary lookup using OpenStreetMap data.
      10
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: coordinate validation/conversion/CRS transformation, geometry operations, place lookup, routing modes, terrain, weather, time, data conversion, and RF analysis are all separated. Descriptions explicitly cross-reference similar tools (e.g., coord_convert vs coord_transform_crs, geom_measure vs route_directions), so misselection is unlikely.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a predictable lower_snake_case prefix-based pattern (coord_, geom_, place_, route_, terrain_, rf_) and are readable. However, not all follow a single verb_noun grammar: some are noun_noun (route_directions, env_weather) or noun_prep_noun (time_at_location), making the convention consistent but not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 22 tools, the count sits above the typical 3-15 range and feels slightly heavy, but the broad geospatial domain justifies the number. Each tool covers a distinct capability with no obvious redundancy, and the prefix grouping keeps the set navigable.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core geospatial workflows well: coordinate/CRS handling, geometry analysis, geocoding/search, routing, terrain, weather, timezone, data conversion, and RF. Minor gaps such as batch geocoding, historical weather, or route optimization exist, but most are workarounds and tools compose cleanly (e.g., isochrones into geom_overlay/relate).

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues