A
licenseB
qualityA
maintenanceEnables AI image and video generation tasks (text-to-image, image-to-video, edit, upscale, etc.) via RunAPI, with support for polling and pricing lookups.
10
239 npm
Apache 2.0
RunningHub Image Gen MCP Plugin
by ysbzc2022
Related Servers
Alternatives to RunningHub Image Gen MCP Plugin
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables text-to-image generation using Z Image models via RunAPI, with task management and pricing lookup.335 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables creating, polling, and checking pricing for Seedream image generation tasks (edit and text-to-image) through a single RunAPI API key.636 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables image editing, remixing, and text-to-image generation using Qwen 2 models via RunAPI. Supports task polling and pricing checks.527 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables creating and managing GPT Image tasks (edit and text-to-image) via RunAPI, with options to poll status and check pricing.594 npmApache 2.0
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered image and video generation through the TensorsLab API using models like SeeDream and SeeDance. It supports tasks such as creating high-resolution media from text prompts, image-to-video conversion, and monitoring generation status.9-
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation3/5
The tools have clear descriptions but overlap: text_to_image and run_text_to_image both submit tasks, with run_text_to_image combining submission and polling. An agent might be uncertain which to use, though the descriptions help distinguish asynchronous vs synchronous workflows.
Naming Consistency2/5
Naming is mixed: 'query_task' and 'run_text_to_image' follow a verb_noun pattern, but 'text_to_image' lacks a verb and reads as a noun phrase. The patterns are inconsistent, reducing predictability.
Tool Count4/5
Three tools is minimal but reasonable for a focused plugin covering async submission, polling, and a combined sync call. It is slightly under the typical range but not problematic.
Completeness3/5
Covers the core workflow of submitting and retrieving image generation tasks, but lacks obvious operations like canceling tasks or listing all tasks. This leaves notable gaps for a full lifecycle.
Maintenance
ActivityStale
ResponsivenessNo issues