Skip to main content
Glama
yriveiro
by yriveiro

Related Servers

Alternatives to biome-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes TypeScript Language Server Protocol functionality to AI agents, enabling them to query types at specific positions, find definitions and references, get diagnostics, run type tests, and type-check inline code just like in an IDE.
      9
      31 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to interact with TypeScript projects through compiler-level code intelligence, providing tools for navigation, type information, diagnostics, refactoring, and semantic search.
      29
      202 npm
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to perform structural code operations on TypeScript/TSX projects—finding symbols and references and renaming them semantically while preserving source.
      27 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to perform high-performance code search and analysis across multiple languages using symbol indexing, regex text search, and structural AST pattern matching. It also provides tools for technology stack detection and dependency analysis with persistent caching for optimized performance.
      8
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to navigate TypeScript, Markdown, and JSON with editor-grade features such as definitions, references, diagnostics, and code actions via the Model Context Protocol, using the local TypeScript project for each file.
      2
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct: biome_check runs all checks, biome_lint and biome_format focus on specific aspects. The hierarchical overlap (check includes lint/format) is clear from descriptions, so misselection is unlikely. No two tools appear to do the same thing.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Three tools use a biome_ prefix (biome_check, biome_lint, biome_format) while two do not (update_cache, search_documentation). The actions follow a readable verb_noun pattern, but the mixed prefix usage creates inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a Biome utility server. Each tool serves a clear purpose: three for running checks and two for documentation cache management. No unnecessary bloat or thin coverage.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the main Biome check categories (format, lint, assist via biome_check) and documentation needs (update and search). Minor gaps exist: no separate assist-only tool or ability to write/fix files, but the read-only design makes this acceptable.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues