academyinfo-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to academyinfo-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for searching and recommending Korean public resources (rooms, facilities, parking, etc.) using a static snapshot of the eShare OPEN API, with read-only tools for filtered search, detail, recommendation, and filter options.1-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates Korean university information APIs (대학알리미 and 공공데이터포털) into a single MCP server and CLI, enabling search, description, and execution of university data operations such as student, faculty, and finance statistics.410 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for querying Korean school budget, unit projects, and special plans through the School Alert (학교알리미) open data API.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceLocal read-only MCP server for Kwangwoon University notices, providing metadata-only crawling and cached notice access through a local STDIO server.41-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server to query UK higher-education open data including National Student Survey results, student outcomes, and graduate earnings. Data is downloaded locally from official sources and compared against benchmarks.5MIT
- AlicenseDqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for South Korean election research, providing tools to search candidates, retrieve election results, and lookup campaign booklet texts using NEC open data and the krpoltext dataset.161MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools are distinct (list_sources, list_indicators, explain_indicator, validate_source_coverage), but explore_universities overlaps with search_university and compare_universities, as it also resolves universities and returns side-by-side data. This could confuse agents about which tool to use for multi-university comparisons.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (list_, search_, get_, compare_, explain_, validate_, explore_). The verbs clearly indicate the action and the nouns describe the target, making the set predictable.
With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for a read-only academy information service. Each tool contributes a distinct function, and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range, avoiding both bloat and thinness.
The tool surface covers listing sources and indicators, searching/exploring universities, fetching metrics, comparing universities, explaining indicators, and validating coverage. Minor gaps such as a dedicated get_source tool or direct university detail retrieval are workarounds via existing tools, so overall coverage is strong for its stated purpose.