K-Mail-MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to K-Mail-MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables users to interact with their Naver Mail account via the Model Context Protocol. It allows for seamless mail integration and management within MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop.16-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvider-agnostic email MCP server that connects any IMAP mailbox to AI assistants, enabling email management through natural language.823 PyPIAGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA unified MCP server for email access across Gmail, Outlook, iCloud, and generic IMAP providers, enabling search, send, organize, and batch operations.230 npm26MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets Claude read, search, and send email over standard IMAP/SMTP.611 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search, read, send, reply to, organize, and bulk-delete email across multiple IMAP/SMTP mailboxes, with connection pooling and AES-256-encrypted credential storage. Supports 15+ providers through a web-based setup wizard and works with Claude, Cursor, and any MCP client.1,152 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA local MCP server that connects multiple Gmail and Google Calendar accounts to Claude Desktop, enabling email and calendar management across accounts.4-
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools have clear, distinct purposes, but list_mailboxes and get_watched_mailboxes both describe returning the same discovered/excluded/effective folder state, which creates real ambiguity. The detailed descriptions help, but an agent could still easily pick the wrong one.
All tool names follow a consistent lowercase snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_*, get_*, set_*, read_*, reset_*, generate_*, and check_new_mails. There are no mixed conventions or vague naming styles.
Eight tools is a reasonable and well-scoped size for an email monitoring server. However, the overlapping list_mailboxes/get_watched_mailboxes pair suggests the surface is slightly over-scoped, since one of those tools may be redundant.
The core monitoring loop is covered: list accounts, scan new mail, read bodies, generate categories, manage folder exclusions, and reset the checkpoint. Gaps like no per-account fetch, no category deletion/inspection, and no message actions are minor for a monitoring-focused tool but would limit broader email workflows.