get_worksheet_data

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates a read-only operation, which implies no side effects. However, without annotations, it does not disclose potential failure modes, required permissions, or behavior with empty worksheets. It is adequate but lacks detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with clear sections for Args and Returns. Every sentence is necessary and the structure is front-loaded with purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read tool with two parameters and an output schema (implied), the description is adequate. However, it lacks usage context, such as whether the workbook must be open or how column data is structured. The output schema likely covers return details, so completeness is acceptable but not exceptional.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description merely repeats parameter names ('Workbook name', 'Sheet name') without adding meaning about format, case sensitivity, or how to specify paths. With 0% schema description coverage, the description should provide more context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Read data from an Origin worksheet,' which is a specific verb (read) and resource (Origin worksheet). This distinguishes it from sibling tools that write or modify worksheet data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'set_worksheet_data' or 'list_worksheets'. The description only lists parameters without usage context or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.