Skip to main content
Glama
youjunxiaji

gl-mcp-feedback

by youjunxiaji

Related Servers

Alternatives to gl-mcp-feedback

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with dual Web UI and desktop application interfaces, enabling AI to confirm with users via prompts and real-time feedback to reduce speculative operations and improve efficiency.
      2
      38 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An interactive feedback MCP server with a web UI, enabling AI-driven development workflows where AI can prompt users for feedback before taking actions, supporting platforms like Cursor, Cline, and Windsurf.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with a Web UI and desktop app, allowing users to provide interactive feedback to AI models through prompts, images, and session tracking.
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables human-in-the-loop workflow in AI-assisted development tools by allowing users to provide direct feedback to AI agents without consuming additional premium requests.
      1
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables users to review and refine AI outputs through a local web UI, returning feedback as free tool call results to save on GitHub Copilot premium requests. It allows for multiple rounds of iterative improvements within a single request session.
      1
      30
      -

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools have clearly different runtime behaviors: interactive_feedback drives user dialogue, while get_system_info reads environment data. There is no direct overlap, but get_system_info appears unrelated to the feedback domain, which weakens the overall set coherence.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Both names use snake_case, so they are readable and mechanically consistent. However, interactive_feedback is a noun/adjective phrase while get_system_info follows a verb_noun pattern, so the naming convention is mixed rather than predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is borderline thin for a server whose core purpose is interactive feedback, especially when one tool carries almost all the domain behavior. The second tool is a small unrelated utility rather than a complementary feedback operation.

    Completeness3/5

    interactive_feedback is richly specified and covers many runtime states such as timeout, queued messages, images, and termination handling. However, there are no explicit session-management or history tools, and get_system_info is isolated from the feedback workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues