Skip to main content
Glama
youjunxiaji

gl-mcp-feedback

by youjunxiaji

Related Servers

Alternatives to gl-mcp-feedback

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with dual Web UI and desktop application interfaces, enabling AI to confirm with users via prompts and real-time feedback to reduce speculative operations and improve efficiency.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An interactive feedback MCP server with a web UI, enabling AI-driven development workflows where AI can prompt users for feedback before taking actions, supporting platforms like Cursor, Cline, and Windsurf.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with a Web UI and desktop app, allowing users to provide interactive feedback to AI models through prompts, images, and session tracking.
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables human-in-the-loop workflow in AI-assisted development tools by allowing users to provide direct feedback to AI agents without consuming additional premium requests.
      1
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables users to review and refine AI outputs through a local web UI, returning feedback as free tool call results to save on GitHub Copilot premium requests. It allows for multiple rounds of iterative improvements within a single request session.
      1
      30
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: interactive_feedback collects user feedback via a web UI, and get_system_info retrieves system environment details. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The tool names do not follow a consistent pattern. 'interactive_feedback' is an adjective-noun phrase while 'get_system_info' follows a verb_noun convention, mixing styles and making the set feel inconsistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server is on the thin side. The system info tool seems unrelated to the core feedback domain, so the count feels slightly inflated for the apparent purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The interactive_feedback tool provides a complete feedback loop, including handling skips, termination, and rich summaries, so there are no obvious gaps in the primary purpose. The system info tool is an extra that doesn't address any feedback-related gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues