get_fred_seriesRetrieve FRED economic series observations as typed JSON snapshots, using recorded fixtures now or live API keys later.
Return a FRED series observation from fixtures (live key optional later).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| series_id | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the behavioral disclosure burden. It does reveal that data comes from fixtures and that a live key may be optional later, but it does not clarify read-only behavior, error handling, or authentication requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. The parenthetical about a future live key is slightly tangential but very brief.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read tool with an output schema, the description covers the core purpose adequately. However, missing parameter semantics and lack of sibling differentiation leave meaningful gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single required parameter series_id has 0% schema description coverage. The description implies it is a FRED series identifier, but adds no format, examples, or constraints to compensate for the missing schema documentation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb (Return) and resource (FRED series observation), with source details (fixtures). It is clear but does not distinguish itself from sibling data-retrieval tools such as get_cpi or get_unemployment_rate.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No when-to-use guidance, alternatives, or prerequisites are provided. The parenthetical about a live key being optional later does not help an agent decide when to call this tool instead of its siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.