get_cell_style

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It states the tool reads style data, but does not mention behavior for empty cells, invalid indices, or performance. The list of style components adds some context but not deep behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose is stated in a single line, followed by a parameter list. No redundant text. However, the parameter list could be integrated into schema descriptions; still, it is efficient and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lists the style components returned. Since an output schema exists (though not shown), it is acceptable. It does not cover edge cases, but for a simple read tool, the information is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It clarifies that 'sheet' is 0-based, 'row' and 'column' are 1-based, which adds meaning beyond the schema's titles and types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get the style (font, fill, border, alignment, number format) of a cell', specifying both the verb and resource with details of what style includes. It distinguishes from siblings like get_cell which retrieves the cell value, and get_cells which retrieves multiple cell values.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. While siblings like get_cell and get_cells exist, the description does not explain when to choose this for style retrieval over or after other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.