Register Yolfi Workspace For Agent

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds significant context beyond annotations: it reveals the tool is one-time ('returns an API key once'), specifies it uses a public registration endpoint, and instructs on secure key storage. No contradiction with annotations (openWorldHint=true is consistent with registering a workspace).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences front-load the core purpose and condition, then provide essential post-action guidance. No unnecessary words; every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the return value ('API key'), the condition for use, and a warning about secret storage. No output schema exists, so the description compensates well. Missing details like exact error handling or rate limits, but acceptable for a straightforward registration tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add extra meaning for individual parameters; it only provides context about the key and storage. No additional parameter semantics beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Register') and resource ('Yolfi workspace') with a specific condition ('when no YOLFI_API_KEY exists yet'), distinguishing it from sibling tools that handle authentication status, organization management, or payment operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states when to use this tool ('when no YOLFI_API_KEY exists yet') and provides post-usage guidance ('store it in an ignored env file or secret manager before using private tools'). It does not explicitly list alternatives but implies using other tools after registration.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.