one_scrape

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It notably discloses support for navigation timeout, TLS verification control, full-page screenshots, bounded pre-scrape actions, and the gating of executeJavascript. It does not mention error behavior or return structure, but these are less critical for a scraping tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise at two sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, and every clause adds value (outputs, timeout, TLS, screenshots, actions). There is no fluff or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (7 parameters, no output schema, no annotations), the description provides a good overview of capabilities but lacks details on return value structure, error handling, or pagination/navigation behavior. It is adequate but has clear gaps, especially regarding what the returned data looks like for each format.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Since schema description coverage is 100%, the baseline is 3. The description adds some context by mentioning 'bounded pre-scrape actions' and the executeJavascript requirement, which aligns with the actions and allowExecuteJavascript parameters. However, it does not add significant syntax or format details beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool's action ('Scrape a single webpage') and its outputs ('markdown, HTML, links, or a screenshot'), which distinguishes it from the sibling tools by focusing on single-page scraping. It is a specific verb+resource statement, though it does not explicitly contrast with siblings like 'one_extract'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for scraping a single webpage and mentions the prerequisite for executeJavascript ('only when allowExecuteJavascript is true'). However, it does not explicitly state when to choose this tool over alternatives such as one_extract, one_search, or one_map, nor does it provide exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.