open-jev
Related Servers
Alternatives to open-jev
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceBridges Claude with a local Ollama coding model, letting Claude delegate bounded implementation tasks to the local model while retaining reasoning, review, and safety enforcement.121,219 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables Claude Code or any MCP client to ask TypeSafe's Jev for calibrated, typed judgments (probabilities, choices, scores) instead of prose, with local caching and cost tracking.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables OpenCode to route simple, medium, and complex requests through planner-critic-solver logic, with local token-saving cache and compression, and optional delegation of heavy math or science tasks to a GPU-backed service.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables frontier coding agents to delegate routine probabilistic judgments to TypeSafe Jev, providing calibrated triage signals for failures, attempts, completion, context ranking, findings, risk, and generic evidence-grounded questions.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides Claude Code with local-first multimodal semantic search across documents, code, images, and video, plus multi-engine web research with active counter-evidence hunting and source-verified, extract-only briefings.4AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to offload small coding tasks to local Ollama machines and free or paid AI providers, choosing the cheapest available option while enforcing quotas, budgets, and Claude's final review.11MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Most tools are clearly distinct: health checks availability, plan generates a probe, and analyze runs the full pipeline. The slight overlap is between ask and analyze, since both involve asking the Open-Jev server questions, but ask is a direct query about a state while analyze runs the complete planner-to-Jev flow.
All tool names follow the same jev_<verb> pattern with clear verbs: ask, plan, analyze, and health. This makes the toolset highly predictable and easy for an agent to navigate.
Four tools is well-scoped for this focused server. Each tool covers a meaningful operation without redundancy or unnecessary surface area.
The core workflows are covered: checking health, inspecting a generated plan, asking direct questions, and running the full analysis pipeline. A minor gap is that there is no explicit tool to run a previously generated probe exactly, though analyze effectively covers the end-to-end use case.