Skip to main content
Glama
yli769227-jpg

ashare-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to ashare-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Chinese financial reports, providing 44 tools to resolve companies, list/retrieve filings, extract report sections, run AI-based indicator extraction, search via Elasticsearch, and browse a 21,698-rule industry rules dashboard.
      44
      32 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server to fetch Vietnamese corporate financial reports (balance sheet, income statement, cash flow) from cafef.vn using public API, no PDF or OCR needed.
      3
      4 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that wraps SFC financial data API into 32 tools for comprehensive A-share market data, including real-time quotes, rankings, limit-up statistics, news, themes, financials, charts, research reports, and watchlists.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A-share market data MCP server via baostock. Full-stack coverage: K-line, financials, DCF/DDM/PEG valuation, 11 technical indicators with proper split-day volume handling (OBV/MFI on raw bars), CN-style KDJ (J=3K-2D), risk metrics (Beta/Sharpe/MaxDD with stock-suspension-aware aligned returns), and PBoC macro data.
      25
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing A-share market data tools (daily OHLCV, real-time quotes, financials, northbound capital flow, sector lists) with zero dependencies, also serving as a template for building custom MCP servers.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: retrieving financial statements, cross-checking consistency, and comparing peers. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (compare_peers, cross_check_balance, get_three_statements), making them predictable and clear.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is minimal but sufficient for the focused domain of A-share annual financial analysis. The count feels well-scoped without being overly thin.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover core workflows: data retrieval, internal consistency checks, and peer comparison. Minor gaps like quarterly data or individual ratio lookups exist, but the surface is largely complete for annual report analysis.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues