stop_monitor

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description details what happens: kills ffmpeg process, removes temp files, clears buffer. This is transparent for a cleanup tool. However, it does not mention idempotency or error handling for invalid stream_id.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise: two sentences. The first states the purpose, the second lists specific actions. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given an output schema exists, return values are not needed. The description covers the main behavior and cleanup. Minor gap: no mention of edge cases like already stopped stream.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the tool description does not explain the 'stream_id' parameter's purpose or format. The parameter is left completely undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Stop monitoring a live stream and clean up all resources.' It distinguishes from siblings like 'monitor_live_stream' which starts monitoring, and others which analyze or retrieve transcripts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It implies it should be used after 'monitor_live_stream', but there is no explicit context or prerequisites mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.