Skip to main content
Glama
yksanjo

Unified Memory MCP

by yksanjo

Remember

remember

Create a durable memory entry in a local vault for persistent storage and retrieval by agents. Supports tagging, typing, scoping, and confidence levels.

Instructions

Create a durable memory entry in the local vault.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tagsNoLower-friction labels used for filtering.
typeNoKind of memory.
scopeNoWho or what this memory applies to.
sourceNoWhere this memory came from.
contentYesThe memory content to store.
metadataNoSmall JSON object for source references or app metadata.
namespaceNoProject, company, repo, or user namespace.
sensitiveNoHide from default search/list/get results.
confidenceNoConfidence from 0 to 1.
expires_atNoOptional ISO timestamp when the memory expires.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, but the description adds minimal behavioral context beyond 'durable' and 'local vault'. It does not disclose side effects, idempotency, or what happens on duplicate creation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that covers the core function without unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 10 parameters and no output schema, the description is minimal. It provides no information about return values or parameter interactions, though the schema is detailed. Adequate for a simple create operation but lacks depth.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add extra meaning; all parameter details are already in the input schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the resource 'durable memory entry in the local vault'. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like search_memory, list_memories, and forget_memory which have different operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites, when not to use it, or contrast with siblings like update_memory or search_memory.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yksanjo/unified-memory-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server