transcript
Retrieve the file path of the session transcript to access logs and command outputs.
Instructions
Get the transcript file path for this session.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes |
Retrieve the file path of the session transcript to access logs and command outputs.
Get the transcript file path for this session.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states 'Get the transcript file path', without disclosing if it's read-only, side effects, or behavior for missing sessions. Minimal transparency for a getter.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (one sentence), making it concise, but it lacks structure (no headers, bullets) and misses important details that could be added without increasing length significantly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, no annotations, and an undescribed parameter, the description is severely incomplete. It doesn't explain what the transcript file path is, its format, or potential errors, leaving the agent without enough context for correct invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single parameter 'session_id' has no description in the schema (0% coverage), and the description does not add any information beyond the parameter name. It mentions 'this session' but doesn't link it to the parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'transcript file path', specifying it's for 'this session'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like snapshot_screen or snapshot_scrollback, but lacks specificity about the session context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites or contraindications. This leaves the agent without context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yiwenlu66/PiloTY'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server