Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to design-parts

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agents to read, write, and organize notes in a local-first, human-in-the-loop note-taking app.
      0
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents read and write access to a folder of Markdown notes, supporting full-text search, reading, listing, and writing notes. It is deliberately small, with no dependencies beyond the MCP SDK, and includes proper path traversal protection.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for a personal notes/knowledge base that enables AI assistants to create, search, and retrieve notes using natural language. It exposes tools like create_note and search_notes, resources for each note, and a summarize_tag prompt.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing a local, domain-agnostic knowledge base using Markdown notes with frontmatter. Enables AI agents to capture, read, search, link, and maintain notes with atomic writes and privacy controls.
      13
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The three tools have clearly distinct purposes: search_parts discovers/retrieves matching entries, get_part retrieves a specific part's details, and get_source retrieves provenance/README information. There is no meaningful overlap in their intended use.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: search_parts, get_part, get_source. The plural/singular distinction is natural and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools are well-scoped for a read-only design parts reference library: discovery, part detail, and source provenance. Each tool earns its place without excess.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers search, part retrieval, and source lookup well. A minor gap is that empty search returns only the full invention table, not a direct bulk list of all parts/anchors, though these can be reached by iterating notes.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues