queryJob
Check the current status of an RPA job by providing its unique identifier (UUID). Use this to monitor job progress or completion.
Instructions
该接口用于查询RPA应用JOB状态。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| jobUuid | Yes | RPA应用运行uuid,必填 |
Check the current status of an RPA job by providing its unique identifier (UUID). Use this to monitor job progress or completion.
该接口用于查询RPA应用JOB状态。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| jobUuid | Yes | RPA应用运行uuid,必填 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It implies a read-only query operation but does not disclose error handling, rate limits, or what happens if jobUuid is invalid. For a simple query, the lack of detail is acceptable but not exceptional.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence that conveys the essential information with no wasted words. It is appropriately front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one param, no output schema), the description states the basic purpose but does not mention expected output format, error codes, or how the status is returned. The context from sibling tools helps partially, but additional detail would improve completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (the single parameter jobUuid is described). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's 'RPA应用运行uuid,必填' (required uuid). Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('查询' - query) and the resource ('RPA应用JOB状态' - RPA application JOB status). It is specific and easily distinguishes from siblings like startJob (start) and uploadFile (upload).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage context or alternatives are provided. The description only states the function, without guidance on when to use this tool versus queryApplist, queryClientList, or queryRobotParam. No when-not-to-use notes.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ying-dao/yingdao_mcp_server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server