Retrieve your current workspace context including active project, task, and workspace information.
Get current workspace context.
Check active project, task, and workspace info.
<when_not_to_use>
To list tasks → use list_tasks
To get task details → use get_task </when_not_to_use>
get_context()
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v3.1.7Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description does not disclose behavioral traits such as side effects, permissions, or read-only nature. For a simple getter, lack of detail is acceptable but not exemplary.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Brief front-loaded sentence followed by structured XML tags (usecase, when_not_to_use, example). Efficient but slightly verbose with tags; still clear and well-organized.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters and no output schema, the description provides sufficient context: purpose, usage guidelines, and an example. Could mention return format but not essential for such a simple tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Zero parameters, so description need not add parameter info. Schema coverage is 100%. Description adds no param details, but none are required; baseline 4 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Get current workspace context' and elaborates via <usecase> that it returns active project, task, and workspace info. Distinguishes from siblings by listing when not to use (list_tasks, get_task).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly provides when to use (usecase) and when not to use with specific alternatives (list_tasks, get_task), helping agent decide contextually.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.