fetch
Retrieve and read content from any web page by passing its URL to the r.jina.ai service.
Instructions
使用 r.jina.ai 读取 URL 并获取其内容
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | 需要抓取的网页url |
Retrieve and read content from any web page by passing its URL to the r.jina.ai service.
使用 r.jina.ai 读取 URL 并获取其内容
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | 需要抓取的网页url |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations; description only mentions using r.jina.ai but lacks disclosure on read-only nature, error handling, rate limits, or output format. Insufficient for safe invocation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with purpose, no extraneous information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple 1-param tool with no output schema, description is minimally sufficient but lacks details on expected output format or constraints.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% so parameter meaning is clear from schema. Description adds minimal value ('get content') beyond the parameter description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb-resource-action: using r.jina.ai to read a URL and get its content. It distinguishes from siblings (search, translate) as a fetch operation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (search, translate). No when-not or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yiGmMk/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server