Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mathematica-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      This MCP server gives an AI coding host controlled, client-agnostic access to a local machine's developer capabilities: transactional file edits, shell and PTY execution, Git and project inspection, language-server operations, isolated browser automation, Windows UI automation, VS Code state, durable jobs, and checkpoints, all bounded by filesystem root allowlisting and resource admission controls. It speaks standard MCP over stdio, Streamable HTTP, and legacy HTTP+SSE, and can also run headless as a long-lived job runner without any hosted model vendor.
      114
      ISC
    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables controlled local developer operations including file and process management, shell execution, SSH, WSL, Docker, Git, browser and desktop automation, media processing, and asynchronous jobs through MCP.
      146
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Mac file and terminal tools for local AI clients, plus an opt-in ChatGPT Developer Mode relay. Checked edits, bounded reads and real exit codes. Free MIT agent; OpenAI listing under review. Owner-level access, not a sandbox.
      13
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients and AI coding agents to query a running editor instance for real-time LSP diagnostics, symbol/type information, references, file opening, and workspace-wide symbol renaming, avoiding slow tsc/eslint runs.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects ChatGPT and MCP clients to authorized local development environments, enabling secure file access, shell execution, persistent tasks, browser/desktop control, and remote management of projects.
      18
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: evaluating code, exporting results to files, managing/inspecting the kernel process, and querying symbol documentation. There is no overlap between execution, file output, process control, and introspection, so an agent can select unambiguously.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a uniform `mathematica_<noun/verb>` snake_case pattern with a consistent server prefix. The verbs (evaluate, export, information) and the noun_status form read predictably and consistently.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a Mathematica kernel bridge: evaluation handles nearly all computation, while export, kernel_status, and information cover the few things evaluation cannot do. Each tool earns its place with no redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: run code, persist state, write results to disk, inspect the kernel, and look up symbols. Minor gaps exist — no tool to read/import existing files back into the kernel or to cleanly shut down the kernel — but these are workable via evaluate or ignored.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues