mp_getLogs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description only states get logs and optionally clear, but does not explain side effects of clearing, connection prerequisites, or behavior in edge cases. The complex 'connection' parameter is left undefined.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no redundancy. However, could be expanded with a brief note on connection prerequisites or return format without harming conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite complex nested 'connection' object (16 sub-properties) and no output schema, the description provides zero context on connection setup, expected response, or log contents. Inadequate for an AI agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% (no parameter descriptions). Description only mentions 'logs' and 'clear' but does not explain the 'connection' object's properties or the exact effect of 'clear' (e.g., clears logs permanently?). User must infer from parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb '获取' (Get) and resource '小程序控制台日志' (mini program console logs), with optional clearing. This distinguishes it from sibling tools which cover other mini program operations like calling wx, navigating, screenshots.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance when to use this tool versus others, no precondition hints (e.g., requires connection), and no exclusion scenarios. The description is purely functional.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.