JobVerify
Related Servers
Alternatives to JobVerify
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server that exposes multiple OSINT tools to AI assistants like Claude, enabling sophisticated reconnaissance and information gathering tasks using industry-standard OSINT tools.241MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAI-powered OSINT framework exposing 10 tools (email, username, breach, WHOIS, IP, subdomain, phone, Shodan, dorks, Pastebin) as an MCP server for Claude Code and Claude Desktop, with an autonomous agent REPL and direct CLI.24903 PyPI1,626MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI assistants like Claude read LinkedIn data through your own logged-in browser session. Access profiles and companies, search for jobs, or get job details.17Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI assistants like Claude read LinkedIn data through your own logged-in browser session. Access profiles and companies, search for jobs, or get job details.19Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceCyberSecurity MCP Server extends Claude with real-time cybersecurity reconnaissance capabilities that Claude doesn't have by default. Instead of manually running 5 different tools across different terminals, just tell Claude "analyze google.com" and get a complete security breakdown instantly. Tools included: * WHOIS Lookup — registrar, ownership, creation/expiry dates * DNS Enumeration — A,827MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenance🦞 MCP server for OpenClaw - secure bridge between Claude.ai and your self-hosted OpenClaw assistant with OAuth2 authentication7171 npm184MIT
TDQS
Scored across 21 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct scope (domain age, email auth, phone validity, crypto scam DB, etc.), with explicit usage guidance. No two tools overlap in purpose.
Most tools follow a 'check_' or 'verify_' prefix pattern, with a few exceptions like 'extract_entities' and 'parse_email_headers'. All use snake_case and descriptive verbs, making the set mostly consistent.
21 tools is above the typical 3-15 range but justified by the comprehensive domain coverage. Each tool addresses a distinct verification need, so the count feels well-scoped rather than bloated.
The tool set covers a wide range of signals (domain, email, phone, crypto, username, company, URL, headers, entities). Minor omissions like broader social media checks are acceptable given the focused use case.