read
Acknowledge consumption of messages to advance the read cursor, coordinating agent progress.
Instructions
Advance the read cursor (acknowledge consumption).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| up_to | Yes | ||
| agent_id | Yes |
Acknowledge consumption of messages to advance the read cursor, coordinating agent progress.
Advance the read cursor (acknowledge consumption).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| up_to | Yes | ||
| agent_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description is too brief to disclose behavioral traits like side effects, idempotency, or required permissions beyond the action of advancing a cursor.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise but lacks structure and is under-specified, missing critical details that would make it effective.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with two required parameters and no annotations or output schema, the description is incomplete and fails to provide a clear understanding of how to use it.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema coverage and no parameter details in the description, the agent receives no additional meaning for 'agent_id' or 'up_to' beyond their names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states the action is to 'Advance the read cursor' which is a specific verb and resource, but it does not distinguish from siblings like 'inbox' or 'claims', leaving the purpose somewhat vague.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or conditions, leaving the agent without context for invocation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yesitsfebreeze/mesh'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server