Skip to main content
Glama
yenyifu

MCP Domain Availability Server

by yenyifu

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Domain Availability Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to check domain availability, perform batch domain lookups, and generate intelligent domain name suggestions across multiple TLDs using WHOIS integration.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Confidence-scored domain availability checking for AI agents via real-time DNS and WHOIS lookups. Bulk check up to 100 domains, WHOIS enrichment, and quota monitoring. All tools are read-only.
      3
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables checking domain name availability using WHOIS lookups and DNS resolution. Supports both single and batch domain checking with detailed availability analysis.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables users to check domain name availability across 877 TLDs, generate intelligent suggestions, and retrieve WHOIS registration information. It supports bulk domain checks and cross-TLD searches through natural language interfaces.
      0
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform WHOIS lookups to retrieve domain registration details, including ownership, registration dates, and availability status without requiring browser searches.
      4
      15 npm
      21
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one checks a single domain, while the other handles multiple domains. The descriptions reinforce this distinction, making misselection unlikely. However, the similarity in core functionality could cause minor confusion if an agent needs to decide between them for a single domain.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'check_' prefix and snake_case naming. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style or convention across the tool set.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a domain availability service. While the tools cover basic availability checks, the scope is limited, and more operations (e.g., domain suggestion, registration status, or pricing) might be expected. This borderline count could hinder agent workflows.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is significantly incomplete for a domain availability server. It lacks essential operations such as domain suggestion, registration initiation, pricing lookup, or WHOIS details retrieval. Agents will face dead ends when trying to perform common domain-related tasks beyond basic availability checks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues