Skip to main content
Glama
yehuoshun

yuque-ai-mcp

by yehuoshun
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to yuque-ai-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • BigContext MCP

      Rixmerz
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables working with large documents of any size by intelligently segmenting them and using TF-IDF search to retrieve only relevant fragments, preventing context window saturation. Provides 31 domain-agnostic tools for document ingestion, semantic analysis, epistemological validation, and extraction verification across formats like PDF, EPUB, and HTML.
      31
      MIT

    • stablebaseline-mcp

      stablebaseline
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      End-to-end agent-managed company brain. Humans and any MCP agent co-author living docs (Markdown + extensions), 40+ visual diagrams (Mermaid, BPMN, D2, PlantUML, ELK, Excalidraw), plans, and a self-learning Knowledge Graph. 163 tools across 16 categories. Auth: OAuth 2.1 or API key. Lean, secure, affordable — from individuals to enterprise.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 62 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tool clusters overlap heavily: v2 and cookie-based 'web' versions of get/list doc, repo, TOC, and delete; three search tools; two TOC update tools; and copy operations for doc, repo, and catalog node. Descriptions explain differences, but an agent still faces high risk of selecting the wrong variant.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all tools follow the yuque_<verb>_<noun> snake_case pattern, which is predictable. The cookie-based family inserts 'web_' and some tools use 'batch_' prefixes, but these are consistent within their groups and still readable.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 62 tools, this is far beyond the 3-15 sweet spot and exceeds the rubric's 50+ threshold for an extreme mismatch. The count is inflated by redundant standard and web API pairs, making the surface over-provisioned relative to the core task set.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers docs, repos, notes, TOC, groups, members, boards, recycles, search, export/import, versions, statistics, and upload/attachments. Group CRUD beyond member management and document comments are notable gaps, but most lifecycle operations are present.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources