A
licenseB
qualityB
maintenanceMCP server for job search, enabling profile creation, job hunting, review, and supervised application preparation without auto-submission.
41
Apache 2.0
performance-mcp
by yc-lm
Related Servers
Alternatives to performance-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides tools to query and analyze an employee knowledge graph in Neo4j, including semantic resume search, person similarity, and read-only Cypher queries.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that performs automated code reviews by analyzing git diffs against configurable review standards with custom reviewer personas.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for conversation recording and review management, supporting recording, querying, and statistical analysis of conversation history with dual transport mode.15MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for querying student information, validating result data, and analyzing student results from a local database.-
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables deployment and management of MCP servers through a simple configuration-based interface.1-
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 4 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: periods, evaluations list, evaluation detail, and draft saving. Descriptions clearly differentiate them, with no overlapping purposes.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case: 'list_periods', 'list_performance_evaluations', 'get_performance_evaluation_detail', 'save_performance_draft'. The verb choice (list vs get) appropriately distinguishes collection from single item retrieval.
Tool Count4/5
With 4 tools, the server covers basic viewing and drafting for performance evaluations, which is a reasonable minimal set. It does not feel overly thin or excessive for the stated purpose.
Completeness2/5
The toolset supports listing periods and evaluations, viewing details, and saving drafts, but critically lacks a tool to submit or finalize an evaluation. This is a notable gap that would prevent completing the core evaluation workflow.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues