Skip to main content
Glama
yashavsarmal30

Multi-Agent Deep Researcher MCP

by yashavsarmal30
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Multi-Agent Deep Researcher MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MyWebSearch MCP

      iuiu-py
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform unified web research through a single MCP server, including search, page fetching, recursive crawling, document parsing, YouTube transcript extraction, and deep multi-query research.
      3
      -

    • jiro

      DevAnimecx
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform live web searches across 9 engines, scrape web pages into clean formats, and run agentic research with citations via MCP.
      2
      MIT

    • deep-research

      troyhantech
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables deep research tasks using a multi-agent architecture that integrates any LLM and MCP tools. Available via MCP stdio, streamable HTTP, and SSE transports.
      17
      MIT

    • groundwork

      Des-Sleigh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform grounded web research with injection resistance, claim verification, and cost-aware routing through MCP tools like web_search, fetch_url, extract_claims, and check_grounding.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct task: generating a synthesized report, running a lightweight search, listing existing reports, and reading a specific report. Deep_research and quick_search are related but clearly separated by output depth and purpose.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The names are clear and mostly follow a readable pattern, with list_research_reports and read_research_report using verb_noun construction. deep_research and quick_search break that pattern by leading with a modifier, but all names are concise snake_case and easy to predict.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is a well-scoped size for a research server: one for investigation, one for quick lookup, and two for managing generated reports. No tool feels redundant or unnecessary.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core research workflow and report retrieval end-to-end. A delete/remove report operation would make report lifecycle management more complete, but agents can still list, read, and generate reports without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources