Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to bq-cost-guard

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables validation and dry-run analysis of BigQuery SQL queries without execution. Provides cost estimates, schema previews, and syntax validation for BigQuery queries.
      9
      37 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Validates BigQuery SQL syntax and performs dry-run analysis without executing queries, providing cost estimates, referenced tables, and schema previews.
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables cost optimization and financial operations for Google BigQuery through natural language interactions. Provides insights into BigQuery spending, usage patterns, and cost management recommendations.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to pre-flight estimate query costs, enforce hard budgets, reconcile actual billed spend, and suggest cheaper rewrites across BigQuery, Snowflake, and Databricks.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables secure read-only interaction with Google BigQuery through natural language, including listing datasets, listing tables, retrieving metadata, and executing queries with cost controls.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusion or misselection. Its purpose (dry-run cost estimation) is unmistakable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single name 'estimate_query_cost' follows a clean verb_noun convention and is descriptive. No inconsistent conventions exist to penalize.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool is thin even for a narrow 'cost guard' purpose; there is no way to estimate multiple queries, compare variants, or inspect table metadata. It functions but feels minimal.

    Completeness3/5

    Core dry-run cost estimation is covered with useful warnings, but the surface is a dead end: no schema/table inspection, partition discovery, or cost comparison to support the guard workflow. Notable gaps remain for a cost-management domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues