Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to emperor-vikunja

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to interact with a Vikunja instance through tools for listing, creating, updating, and removing tasks, projects, and labels. It deliberately avoids permanent task deletion, using a configurable label for soft removal instead.
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Bridges MCP clients to a self-hosted Vikunja instance, exposing tools for managing projects, tasks, labels, and comments.
      64 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Vikunja task management instances through natural language. Supports comprehensive project and task operations including CRUD, assignments, labels, comments, relations, and attachments.
      33
      64 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and other MCP clients list, create, update and complete tasks, browse and create projects, and manage labels in a Vikunja instance through its REST API, running locally over stdio via npx.
      10
      23 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource+action: listing projects vs listing tasks vs reading one task vs creating/updating a task, plus adding a comment. The only mild overlap is `comment` versus `update_task`, since commenting is arguably a mutation of a task, but the descriptions make the boundary clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Five of six tools follow a clean verb_noun pattern (list_projects, list_tasks, get_task, create_task, update_task). The lone `comment` is a bare verb with no object, a minor deviation rather than a different convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a focused task-management integration, and the design wisely folds labels, assignees, priority, due date and project moves into create/update parameters instead of adding one tool per field. Every tool earns its place.

    Completeness3/5

    Task lifecycle is covered for create/read/list/update/comment, but there is no delete or archive operation for tasks and no way to create or manage projects beyond listing them. Comment reading is also capped at the 50 most recent with no pagination escape hatch, which will bite on long threads.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues