Get daily / periodic note

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description discloses output structure (content, frontmatter, tags) and a key prerequisite (plugin requirement). It does not explicitly state read-only behavior, but fetching implies it. Good disclosure for a simple tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, with three short sentences each providing distinct value: purpose, return format, and requirement. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers the essential aspects: what it does, what it returns, and a prerequisite. It could mention error behavior or fallback, but overall it is adequately complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with enum and description for the parameter. The tool description does not add additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool fetches a periodic note (daily, weekly, etc.) and distinguishes it from generic get_note or get_active_note by specifying the plugin requirement and periodic nature.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions the plugin requirement but does not explicitly guide the agent on when to use this tool versus siblings like get_note or when not to use it. Implied usage is clear but no exclusions or alternatives are named.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.