Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
yantrix-ai

Yantrix MCP

by yantrix-ai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Yantrix MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • x402-bazaar-mcp

      sukrutkrdg
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing x402 Bazaar's paid Base APIs (token risk/honeypot, prices, gas, wallet intel, tx decode + AI utilities) as agent tools. Your agent pays per call in USDC over x402 — no API keys, no signup.
      17
      115 npm
      MIT

    • x402farm-mcp

      laurenthalbrun
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides AI agents with pay-per-call access to a suite of tools (honeypot check, token market, DeFi yields, etc.) via USDC on Base using the x402 protocol.
      5 npm
      MIT

    • Agent Kiosk

      ralf9090
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Pay-per-call MCP and x402 v2 server on Base USDC providing 19 keyless tools for AI agents: web extraction, social and academic search, B2B lead and domain intelligence, npm/PyPI package and smart-contract security audits, OFAC compliance screening, and DeFi swap quotes
      5
      23
      MIT

    • @melis-ai/x402-tools-mcp

      mizukaizen
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing 22 pay-per-call utility tools for AI agents (scrape, validate, embed, store, moderate, notify, convert, prevent loops) without accounts or API keys, using USDC payments via the x402 protocol.
      17
      75 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 33 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap in the verification domain (verify_claim, deep_verify_claim, batch_verify) and timezone tools (detect_timezone, convert_timezone, find_timezone_overlap) that could cause mild confusion. The descriptions help differentiate them, but an agent might need to carefully choose between similar tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern throughout (e.g., analyze_call, check_compliance, generate_exam). There are no deviations in naming conventions, making it easy to predict and understand tool functions from their names.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 33 tools, the count is too high for a single server, indicating a lack of focus. The tools span diverse domains like sales analysis, compliance, timezone handling, and memory management, which should likely be split into multiple specialized servers for better coherence.

    Completeness4/5

    Within each sub-domain, the tools provide good coverage (e.g., memory tools include read, write, and search; verification tools offer basic, deep, and batch options). However, some gaps exist, such as no delete operation for memories or limited update capabilities in other areas, but agents can generally work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources