A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceMCP server exposing 10 curated tools for AI agents, providing crypto trading signals, on-chain analysis, and web utilities via pay-per-call x402 endpoints on the Base network.
MIT
Yantrix MCP
by yantrix-ai
Related Servers
Alternatives to Yantrix MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server exposing x402 Bazaar's paid Base APIs (token risk/honeypot, prices, gas, wallet intel, tx decode + AI utilities) as agent tools. Your agent pays per call in USDC over x402 — no API keys, no signup.172461MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that provides AI agents with pay-per-call access to a suite of tools (honeypot check, token market, DeFi yields, etc.) via USDC on Base using the x402 protocol.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to verify facts, check market and on-chain data, search the web, and run AI text tasks through five general-purpose tools, with pay-per-call USDC settlement on Base via x402 and no API key required.5100MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server providing 22 pay-per-call utility tools for AI agents (scrape, validate, embed, store, moderate, notify, convert, prevent loops) without accounts or API keys, using USDC payments via the x402 protocol.17841MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server providing 50+ crypto, market intelligence, and AI inference endpoints with x402 pay-per-request micropayments on Base.1Apache 2.0
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 33 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap in the verification domain (verify_claim, deep_verify_claim, batch_verify) and timezone tools (detect_timezone, convert_timezone, find_timezone_overlap) that could cause mild confusion. The descriptions help differentiate them, but an agent might need to carefully choose between similar tools.
Naming Consistency5/5
Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern throughout (e.g., analyze_call, check_compliance, generate_exam). There are no deviations in naming conventions, making it easy to predict and understand tool functions from their names.
Tool Count2/5
With 33 tools, the count is too high for a single server, indicating a lack of focus. The tools span diverse domains like sales analysis, compliance, timezone handling, and memory management, which should likely be split into multiple specialized servers for better coherence.
Completeness4/5
Within each sub-domain, the tools provide good coverage (e.g., memory tools include read, write, and search; verification tools offer basic, deep, and batch options). However, some gaps exist, such as no delete operation for memories or limited update capabilities in other areas, but agents can generally work around these.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues