YantrikDB MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to YantrikDB MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceSelf-hosted MCP-native agent memory server. Gives AI agents persistent, decay-weighted memory via 83 MCP tools — no cloud, full control. RocksDB+HNSW backend. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.148-- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA local-first long-term memory system for AI coding agents, exposed as an MCP server.61 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenancePersistent memory and human approval for any AI agent. Give your AI agents the ability to remember across sessions and ask humans for approval before sensitive actions. Works with Claude, Cursor, OpenClaw, and any MCP-compatible client.62 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that gives AI coding agents persistent memory and controlled commands. Features a git-backed markdown knowledge vault with FTS5 search, surgical section edits, token-aware context budgeting, and a sandboxed command engine with human approval gates. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini, and more.458249 npm1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenancePersistent, local memory for AI coding agents that learns how you work, not just what you said. Supports Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, and any MCP client.76580 PyPI68MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceZettelkasten-based persistent memory for AI coding agents. Auto-saves atomic knowledge cards with \[\[bidirectional links]] after tasks and auto-recalls before new ones. No vector DB — plain markdown files with git sync. Works as Claude Code plugin or MCP server for Cursor, VS Code Copilot, Codex, and Windsurf.110 npm142MIT
TDQS
Scored across 21 tools
Most tools target a distinct subsystem—write/retrieve/correct/forget memories, graph, temporal, conflicts, triggers, sessions, tasks—and action enums keep sub-operations separate. The main ambiguity is procedure vs skill, which both store and surface reusable knowledge, and memory/recall/temporal overlap in retrieval but with clear usage notes.
All tools are single lowercase tokens, which is a consistent style, but there's no verb_noun convention and names mix nouns (memory, graph) with verbs (remember, forget, recall, think). The action-based subcommands add internal consistency, so the overall pattern is predictable.
21 tools is on the heavy side for one server, and several tools (category, personality, pack) serve niche features. Still, the server's scope is broad—memory, graph, temporal, conflict, session, task, skill—so the count is defensible but borderline.
The surface covers the full memory lifecycle (create/read/update/delete/correct), multiple retrieval modes, graph relationships, conflict resolution, maintenance, sessions, tasks, and even pack import/export. There are no obvious dead ends for the stated purpose.