Skip to main content
Glama
yangsong7

infra-advisor-mcp

by yangsong7

Related Servers

Alternatives to infra-advisor-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      LLM deployment planner: given a model and a GPU, answers will it fit, will it hit your SLO, and what will it cost. Sizes VRAM and KV-cache from the model's real architecture, and labels every number measured, estimated, or unknown.
      5
      735 PyPI
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to fetch live, dated prices for LLM models and cloud compute instances across providers, compare and recommend models, and estimate monthly costs based on workload-specific token shapes and constraints.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Global price benchmarking for AI inference across 2,600+ SKUs from 47 vendors. Query live pricing, market indexes, and model specs via 8 tools. Free tier available.
      8
      78 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI cost calculation, comparison, and optimization across major providers like Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Meta, and Mistral. Supports cost estimation, budget-aware model finding, and token estimation through a simple API and MCP integration.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, from task analysis to cost estimation and report generation. No overlapping functionalities; descriptions clearly differentiate between inference cost, maintenance, training, and comparison tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., analyze_task, estimate_inference_cost, generate_full_report). No mixing of conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the server covers the full lifecycle of infrastructure planning without being bloated. Each tool serves a necessary function, and the count is ideal for the domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set comprehensively addresses the domain: task analysis, model recommendation, inference/training/maintenance cost estimation, TCO comparison, data freshness checks, and report generation/saving. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues